- The name of the title and author for the project you reviewed (1 point)
- I reviewed Erin Mcabe. Her Video is titled just "Project 3 Rough Draft"
- A working hyperlink to the project you reviewed (1 point)
- Here is a link to the video.
- An explanation of the peer review activity you selected for the project you reviewed (1 point)
- I chose to analyze form. Here I looked at the conventions of a video essay and decided which ones she did well, and which she needed to improve upon.
- An explanation of how you think you helped the author with your feedback (in other words, how did you help them make their work better?) (5 points)
- I think I helped her by suggesting things that would make certain clips more cohesive with the rest of her video. For instance, I talked about variance in her voice and adding an image with a clip of audio she presented.
- An explanation of how you incorporated something from the suggested Student’s Guide readings (or any other course materials, if you’d prefer) into your feedback (5 points)
- I talked about variance in the voice in order to captivate listeners. Luckily her video has a lot of outside audio as well. But an engaging voice can really improve a video essay.
- One thing about their work that you admired or think you could learn from (5 points)
- She presented all of her video and audio in a very compelling way. She gave very good background on Sea World and then began showing very saddening clips of whales. I felt that that kind of made an impact: to see something so bright and cheery and then something very heartbreaking.
Sunday, April 17, 2016
Peer Review 12b
In this blog post I will peer review someone who is outside of my class.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment